

Recap, Better Late than Never
By: Gianfranco | March 17th, 2009I have never seen a team win two games so easily, yet play so erratically, and basically find a way to get out of their own way enough to score five goals. This Milan team is in fact a real enigma in the truest sense. One match we have the supposed firepower of Kaka and Ronaldinho and we can’t score, while in another we have absolutely no creative players and we win by three goals. As a fan I shake my head and say by all rights and reservations these last two games should have been one goal draws or even worse, losses, considering the circumstances, but when you look at the last two games and you see a brace by Pato, a goal by Pirlo, and five by Pippo you start to think that maybe this shipping is righting itself after all. I mean these were guys were in a funk, Pato’s being a few weeks with no goals, Pippo’s a few more, and Pirlo’s a few months. Either way the team found a way to get it done and earns the three points yet again.
The three points on this occasion were the most costly of the season as it appears we have lost Abbiati . For all it is worth I do believe Abbiati’s return was the best move we made all summer. He has provided timely saves, sensible play, and a calming presence in the back. This was a far cry from last season were Dida had to be replace by Kalac who did just enough to remind us that we did need a real GK. With the defense the way it is staying in the top four is going to be a challenge.
The midfield was a mystery on Sunday which makes the five goals even more of a surprise. Ambrosini was nonexistent and Flamini was not that far off either. Both players did well getting to the ball but both won very few and their passes, much like Becks and Pirlo were miserable. Pirlo however found a bit of match sense but Becks easily played his worst game in the Rossoneri. Centrally Becks lacks comfort and familiarity and his lack of a left foot which is not so apparent on the right is painfully obvious in the middle of the pitch.
The shining spot that helped Milan push the issue against Siena was the duo of P&P. Pato and Pippo who very oddly enough rarely seem to play and feed off each other like Pato and Borriello did, have found an odd couple dynamic that has yielded 7 goals of Milan’s 8 in the past two weeks. Pippo continues to defy all odds, by all rights he should be spent by the 75th minute, but he manages to use his experience, his guile, and constantly puts himself in the best position to score. It certainly happens to have a young dynamic striker partner that can create and open space for you on all areas of the box while opposing defenders give chase.
Speaking of opposing defenders it is safe to say that Siena were not as a solid as Atalanta last week. Maccarone plays well, but the rest of the club seems to lack a real organizational sense that is the cornerstone of relegation surviving clubs. Usually you hate to play a bottom three team in this stage of the season, but Siena seems to have begun the slide that demises many teams. Milan did well to capitalize on the situation, but the schedule is never forgiving in Serie A and many of the teams won’t be pushovers.
The important thing to take from this match is the fact that Dida, who looked at times a bit unkeen on being in there. Hopefully he gained some confidence and continues to build on that. More than ever we need him to be a success…
| Serie A Match Schedule | Discount Travel to Milan | |||
| AC Milan Results | San Siro information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



………AND ANOTHER THING!!!
If we had a decent defence then would we really asking the trequartista to come back and the help out defensivly?
Me thinks not!
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



Avia, i think you may have misunderstood, we are not asking him to come back and defend, however every player on the pitch is responsbile for pressuring the ball if close to him. SO if a CB has the ball the trequartista should be crowd him, it is a fundamental to basic soccer, the cornerstone of defensive tactics. No one is asking an attacker to come barreling back and defend, though it has be done, you are only asking them to be the first line of pressure and defense. Watch Carlos Tevez for five minutes and it will all begin to make sense.
Posted from
United States

-



good teams defend all over the pitch, and that is the undeniable truth.
Posted from
United States

-



lol, not gona argue against Tevez’s performance! I dont think we currently have anyone who works as hard!
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



“good teams defend all over the pitch, and that is the undeniable truth”
Agreed Gian, i think in terms of applying defensive pressure however this Milan squad is woeful and one of the least defensively minded Milan squads ive seen in a long long time
I posted awhile ago how i felt there was no defensive bite to this team whenever we lost the ball
My philosophy has always been a belief in; When you have the ball -Attack! When you dont -Press!
Im sick of watching our attacks turn into a game of just walking the ball around the park and lacking any urgency in the same way I hate that Rino was the only one who ever seemed to press
The number of times this season, before his injury, Rino would help double up on a player to dispossess him. I swear duckie had more cover with Rino on the pitch also, remember Pato being felled at Siena?? When he was on the ground and attempting to maintain possession with the ball between his legs just before he lashed out, who else was there trying to help him, no one!
I dont think it has all entirely the squads fault as much as Carlo needs to drum it into these guys to press more when they dont have the ball, Aaaaaagggggh! How hard can it be!?!?!?
I personally believe you should ALWAYS be pressing the opponent whenever they have the ball as opposed to standing off and giving them room to run but again, thats not really been a characteristic of this squad and sadly missing
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



gian, there is a certain flaw in your ‘good teams defend all over the pitch’. while in essence its true, in reality its a bit harder than that.
you will very rarely see our strikers hassling the opposing defenders if they have the ball. we really don’t pressure much outside our own half. why? because we don’t have the fastest centerbacks in the world and to compensate for this we have to sit back and play with a deep defending line.
i think this is why we saw favalli starting vs. siena, and i wouldn’t be surprised if senderos starts vs. napoli. because siena have a slow attack (big ol maccarone) but napoli have a very fast attack and counterattacking is their game, a fast[er] defender like senderos is a plus. but then again, donadoni is their coach, so its tough to read them as of now.
thats why we don’t really defend ‘all over the pitch’, but only in our own half, so we don’t get stretched out.
Posted from
United States

-



i can still remember Borriello rushing into our own penalty box to dispossess a player, i was almost in shock!
Shehan – im DYING to see who we will pair Silva with for next season, hopefully it will make a big difference to the way our backline works!?
Posted from
United Kingdom

-



I really don’t remember Kaka always defending. In fact I remember always having a feeling of horror whenever Kaka started to mark someone, you always knew a yellow card was on the way if he insisted in actually trying to get the ball. I don’t see what the difference with Ronaldinho is then! Both when they lose the ball don’t press or at least for the last 2-3 years that has been the case with Kaka.
I agree that this Milan team never presses but that has mostly been the case for the 4-5 years so no surprise there!
Posted from
United States

-



alright, I have to some extent defended seedorf earlier, basing my arguments on the reason that since all our other attacking midfielders were missing, we had to play him. But facts are facts, and the last two games we have benched him, we have scored 8 goals. Coincidence? Maybe, Maybe not.
Me thinks, its maybe not. Seedorf’s ability to not lose the ball easily may actually end up being his own undoing. Since he is able to keep the ball very well, he often sits on it when he could have possibly made a incisive pass to strikers. Hence slowing us down. With beckham on the field, beckham knows he cant keep the ball for a long time, so he tries to pass it on to the striker rather quickly hence giving our attack a healthy pace.
Seedorf will wait and think and will only try to give a sure thing while beckham will just try and try again hoping something sticks, just because he knows that he is about to get dispossessed so he might as well try. The problem is that not all games have enough sure things and the strikers may or may not be able to capitalize. But Beckham is able to give you a sheer quantity of half-chances that the strikers will convert a percentage of based simply on probability.
Not sure if what I was thinking made sense in writing, but seedorf knowing that he wont lose the ball easily makes him less likely to make a quick pass that could either lead to a half chance or lost possession, coz he would rather wait for a more clear opportunity. Sometimes, those are hard to come by in a game.
Posted from
United States

-



K, I agree with Seedorf is the counter killer, but that has its value. Seedorf for me would be the late sub to help hold a lead. In the past Dinho has been applied in this role, but their styles of play are very much opposite. Dinho is more direct, sometimes to a fault, while Seedorf is as indrect as they come. So they both have value, it is just a matter of application.
Posted from
United States

-



Seedorf stops the counters, but since Serginho left we don’t have a player that will do this crazy runs (Kaka is different and better version, but different nevertheless) on the wings and most of the plays go through center or really close to the box, and Seedorf’s superiority in holding the ball comes to team’s advantage.
Him, being dispossessed so easily in previous game was due to the fact that he was left alone in the middle and was attacked with two-three players simultaneously most of the time while around a circle. It was very frustrating, but thinking back I don’t really blame him, Carlo is a culprit.Posted from
United States

-



ESL
Posted from
United States

-



lol, look at GALLIANI talking about the economy. He states that all the clubs around europe are having truobles with the economy. But I’m sorry, the only team having problems is MILAN. Look at INTER their planning to invest 100M in the summer transfers. Milan just dont know how to invest money or maybe coz were too poor.
DISCRACEFUL!Posted from
United States

-



inter also have the honor of being the club with lowest ratio of trophies won per capital spent.
Posted from
United States

-



milan 4 life – i guess galliani is right in this sence… if u look at it what did inter get in return from their signings? mancini ? quaresma? and now that they have been given a 100M more…i really dont think that their new signings will be a hit or anything…
i am also not saying that our signings have been way better.. but still we got flamini for free and he is slowly but surely making it there.. ronaldinho 16M…11 goals in total and nothing close quaresma’s or manicini’s big flop…..Posted from
United States

-



absolutely true shehan!
Posted from
United States

-



Actually fet i cannot think now of a player who saves the ball so easily like dorf.And that thing like he doesnt deserve to play on san siro i dont even want to comment ranjeet
Posted from
United States

-



and milan4life morati spent like 100000 bilions in his life for trasfer market and he did nothing.His grand grandsons will pay his craps
Posted from
United States

-



There was an article once showing the value of Moratti’s transfer and it was laughably bad, granted Mourinho should remedy that a bit, but let them spend…he wants what he cant have and that is the CL!
Posted from
United States

-



Exactly gf
Posted from
United States

-



rite on Gian!
Posted from
United States

-



So what you’re saying is “you’re only as good as your last game” unless your name is seedorf or beckham then you can be crap, suck balls and still start next game??
Posted from
United States

-



fadayn, the lack of depth of this club has A LOT to do with that point…
Posted from
United States

-



Yes thats exactly what im saying if kaka for example plays like shit 10 games in a row you will put him in 11th game in first team.Not cardacio,not flamini but kaka
Posted from
United States

-



only as good as your last game is a figure of speech.
You cant really follow it to the letter. Beckham over time has been very good for us. Seedorf, less so. And there is no question why kaka starts every game he is available, he is a game changer more often than not.
Posted from
United States

Read the rest of the comments
Comments are closed













