

Bologna 1 Milan 4
By: Gianfranco | January 26th, 2009When I saw the lineup at start I will have to say I was extremely discouraged. Carletto had done what he usually does, play the absolute opposite of what we were clamoring for. Before I get into the match itself I want to make something very clear. Milan was not in the driver’s seat at any point prior to Mudingayi’s expulsion, granted momentum was shifting, but if you told me the result and then told me first ten minutes would look this way, I would have told you were crazy.
To help understand the first ten minutes I need only say that Favalli played the worse professional football I have ever seen. Now Favalli is not world class, but the level in which he displayed himself and the fact that Milan were down a goal, I was writing this game off as the a wash. Now we know how it ended, but it doesn’t take much to relive that awful start. As the time wore on, Milan appeared to rejuvenate and look more and more in control, but also more comfortable with the group on the pitch.
It didn’t take a fine footballing eye to see how bad Favalli was, and the inclusion of Antonini would have been nice and given way very little on the skill side. The shocker for me was Senderos, who despite looking a de-evolved David Bechkam, lacked any shred of style and grace, and at any given point could be found lost or extremely happy to have wandered into the correct place on the match. This deal is a loan and it should not last more than that. What I also frustrating was Sinisa’s brash claim that Milan will fold when attacked, and Bologna did just that very early in the match with DiVaio carving holes in the defense and ending in his league leading 15th goal off the PK. But if an adversary tell’s you he will do something, say punch you in the face? Wouldn’t you prepare yourself in some way? Apparently Carletto doesn’t share that common sensical notion, and didn’t prepare the defense with pace. The problem with a win like this is it rewards Carletto’s lunacy by having this lineup result in three points.
For every bad call he made on defense, he was a genius in the attack. His choice to start Becks and Ambro was dutiful rewarded as both players played dividends winning balls, and creating attacking chances. In fact it was Ambro’s tackle that proved the catalyst on the Seedorf goal. Say what you want about Becks, and wish him away, but his inclusion over Dinho’s makes this team better going forward and tracking and back. His first goal as a Rossonero was class, and since he has joined Milan the squad has not lost. In some way Dinho seems to rob space and touches for Ricky and without him on the pitch Ricky and Ducky play absolutely lights out. They have room, they take shots and the interchange and interplay to the point of making the defense chase them around and around the box, and with Becks in the lineup, and Seedorf in the advanced role, Milan is more galvanized on defense. This will only inprove with the return of Rino, but for the time being no one can argue that this team is better with Dinho on the bench, or to make matters clearer Kaka is better without his mate!
Seedorf, who in my opinion didn’t deserve the start, was better than last week, and quite frankly I would prefer him to Dinho in this role. He is a more of compliment to Ricky, and if Gourcuff is returned home, it seems that filling the space of Seedorf would make the most sense and make Milan all the more dangerous. For the regressions made by Seedorf, it seems that Pato only gets stronger. We are witnessing the birth of a striker, and it is exciting. His blend of pace and close quarters play is scintalliting, while he is learning to keep possession and make the pass that springs the attack. I can’t wait until Borriello’s return when those two can play ahead of Kaka and make a mess of opposing defenses. Just imagine for a minute having the three of them all capable with the ball at their feet, and all capable of the clinical finish with each one excelling in their own attributes, strength, pace, and the dribble. If Milan could put losses to Palermo and Juventus behind them, and make up points as this return leg continues, the squad will only get healthy and make wreak havoc for the top of the table. The derby comes soon, but before that we worry about Genoa midweek. As an old coach once told me, if you keep winning the rest will work itself out!
| Serie A Match Schedule | Discount Travel to Milan | |||
| AC Milan Results | San Siro information & hotels |
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
![]() |
Comments
-



GF, don’t you think you’re being slightly critical of his abilities and his chances? I think it’s important to highlight the difficulty of assimilating with a team when you are not played frequently at all. For example, Antonini, a good, young player who has oodles of potential, but hardly gets a chance to prove himself. It’s different for someone like Pippo, as he has played the role of subbed-on goal poacher for years, and is comfortable with his role. His mentality would be different to say Gourcuff’s or Antonini’s as Pippo has already past his peak, and acknowledges that his role is not as great as it once was with the team. The potential for Gourcuff and Antonini remains unbound and for this reason I feel that they should be given the time to develop and mature and reach that peak of excellence. Perhaps I’m just being optimistic
Posted from
Australia

-



Gourcuff really got chances, even though insufficient he never really proved himself in my opinion. but he’s tearing it up in ligue1 so one teams lost>another’s gain its highly unlikely he will be back, but Thiago Neves is unsettled at Hamburg and wants to leave; he was very good at the summer Olympics what do u guys think. and alessandro a most heartwarming welcome to the blog from me.
Posted from
United States

-



i’m not sure why many people are in love with antonini. hes not young, although he looks it. hes 27. hes not the best fullback we have (albeit deserves a spot over favalli), but we shouldn’t exaggerate his abilities.
samuel, enough with the brazilians bro!
Posted from
United States

-



that’s is a brilliant idea gian,sell gourcuff to arsenal and get adebayor.
thats only what milan is lacking at the moment,a superb focal striker.
what adebayor can provide to milan is his height,bady strengh than similar to ibrahimovic and adriano of inter.
or perhaps we can go for a much better player in benzema,gave cuffy to lyon and buys benzema in the summer,a lot of speculation over his future at lyon.benzema have said if lyon is unable to move further in this year champions league he’ll consider moving out from lyon,that only leaves him with one place to go thats milan.
he’ll not going to madrid or barca becoz he’ll never get a regular starts bcoz of the bunch of striker they have there.
not liverpool and chelsea bcoz they dont have anymore money,not man.utd bcoz they cant even afford teves.
but man.city would come with bigger bid and steal him away from us.
so milan needs to show ambition and bring him to san siro.the only thing that are yet to complete at milan is the penalty box striker who will compliment pato and leaves pato with his best position as a 2nd striker.
kaka in the midfield and nobody can stop us…hell yeah..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted from
Malaysia

-



Ro it doesnt! Sorry
Posted from
United States

-



a box beast is a must, I agree but Benzema is not that player he is a hybrid, and we dont need that. We need a monster!
Posted from
United States

-



sorry im a fan i just hate the lazy and uncooperative ones ala Adriano, Emerson and now sadly Ronaldinho : ( Fine no more Brazilian signing suggestions..lol. Seriously Fester better get that Agger deal complete. we need a LB pronto, i cant bear watching favalli start another game despite the cool Kaka handshakes.
Posted from
United States

-



Ok that’s fine here is the one that I have done
Posted from
United States

-



shehan there is a romantic feeling towards Antonini, he was raised in the Milan system and he is a wingback, it is a legacy thing more than anything else, but he has shown bright spots both with the Milan and Empoli on loan in the past. Many of you forget that Abate, who is also quite talented still belongs to Milan and may prove just as good as Cuffy given if the chance.
Posted from
United States

-



Benzema is a monster, although no Torres type monster but one Nevertheless. Heck just imagine the new attacking trio of the future if Kaka ever moves on god forbid! Pato>Benzema>Adebayor and a cuffy return? naa never in our wildest dreams
Posted from
United States

-



dont think we get adebayor and cuffy, in fact the best thing we can do with gourcuff is ship him to arsenal for adebayor, even better than bringing him home IMO. We need the target more than another midfielder…
Posted from
United States

-



maybe i am nostalgic but something about this seems to right…
http://cache.gettyimages.com/xc/1637627.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=17A4AD9FDB9CF19390335F8FA9CA92A656CA2876BF5D721E9930FDCFC4C15FBB
right back, center back, goal scorer, leader, why the HELl NOT!Posted from
United States

-



Gourcuff wasnt given a long run in the team. Now it was understood that we were in a desperate fight for 4th place, and in those situations playing a youngsters is not necessarily the best idea. Even if Gourcuff returns he wont be able to cement his place, beacuse he almost plays Kaka’s role at Bordeaux(Attacking midfielder). He might not do well in Seedorf’s role. And while I would love to have him back at Milan,i just dont see it happening.
Also Panucci for 5 months will be great. He can cover up for Nesta.Posted from
United States

-



Regarding Antonini- the fact that he easily has as much talent as Favalli on any day, younger than him by almost 10 years, clearly loves playing for Milan yet continues to be benched endears him to many.
And for Panucci, I’d argue he’s as good as Kaladze, more dependable than Nesta, always preferable to Favalli, if it was for the rest of this season, I’d be all for it.
Posted from
Canada

-

-



No offense to some of you, but you sound like you’re talking out of your arse when you say that Cuffy wasn’t given a chance. If you’d bothered to do any kind of research you’ll find that he played (more than just a bit part) in 33 games during the 06/07 season, with 18 starts, 5 of them in the CL. Given that four stars on the team – Kaka, Pato, Pirlo, and Rino – were also in their late teens early 20’s when they broke into the first team further invalidates that “youth don’t get a chance” argument. In fact, that argument is completely unfounded if you actually did any research.
Maybe a modified argument could be “young players who have more hype than talent actually have to earn a spot at Milan rather than get an automatic spot simply because they are young and hyped.” But then, that doesn’t sound all that unreasonable, does it?
Posted from
United States

-



we need worldclass finisher…
adebayor is cool but do u really think adebayor is better than benzema??
benzema is unlike any other striker i seen in along time,he’s like the combination of ronaldo and sheva.
sheva dont have skills but ronaldo have splendid ball control,but benzema have both.
sheva and ronaldo have the best technique for a striker,benzema can blossom to become a much mature game reader which i feel is not quite at sheva and ronaldo standard but he’s only 20 years old..like pato,he is not fully blossom yet.sometimes he often makes wrong run that resulted to a miss passed from the midfielder,one of the reason is because of his nature as the 2nd striker.he used to play with somebody upfront and for me the combination of benzema and pato can be the best for the next 15 years….hahaha
if berlosconi have ball he can buys benzema without exchanging any player or gave lyon boriello and cuffy to aqcuired benzema..
belive me it will be great time for ac milan football club….later….
Posted from
Malaysia

-



Shingai, Milan has probably had the best transfer policy in the world over the last 5 years!
Dont you think, Shingai, your statement is a bit simple minded? After Kaka, Pato was merely the only bright exception in Milan`s recent transfer policy. How do you feel about players like Dhorasoo, Dida (wages!), Olivera, Ronaldo, Emerson, Gilardino, Favalli, Senderos, Cardacio, Viudez, return of Sheva (the transfer remined confidental!), and even Dinho (25 ml €!;ok, there are some shirts and some tickets),… Probably forgot somebody. Dinho is being benched right now, but was our BIG summer signing. When we are talking about Gourcouff so much, maybe you are right (still think that the buy out clause is comical). If Gourcouff stayed and would be given the playing time that Dinho has/had, I think he would done the same or even better and Milan could (and should) bought an attacker or two quality defenders. I am not the only one who thinks that Milan`s recent transfer policy mainly sucksPosted from
Slovenia

-



sorry shingai, dont buy ur line of reasoning. last season in serieA, gourcuff started in only 4 games (played for the full 90 mins in only 3 out of those 4) nd came on as a sub in only 11 games – that’s a total of 15 games out of 38 and he had an average playing time of only 17.5 minutes in those 12 games – how is that enough time for him to prove his worth? for a youngster to come to a big club like milan and realise that the coach has no confidence in him and gives him minimal playing time is not likely to make him be a star in the first season…
Posted from
India

-



for me cuffy is just not good enough for us…
Carletto is not stupid and all of us have eyes…
we can evalute his performence everytime he get onto the pitch…
he is slow and unable to compete with the old legs we have at san siro,look at pato and what he have done to steal away sheva and pippo’s place…
he deserve to sit proudly at that position bcoz of his hard work…
hard work in training and during the game…
Cuffy didn’t do all of that…perhaps…
and thats why Carletto axe him out….later……
Posted from
Malaysia

-



Mohammad Shukri carlo plays seedorf week in week out. i think gourcuff could fit into seedorfs starting spot and do wonders for you. they play the same game as in taking players on, shooting passing etc and as for the adebayor-benzema there is no doubt benzema is twice as good but he would cost a fortune. him and pato upfront with kaka behind would be the best attack in the world alongside barcelona
Posted from
United States

-



MilanM
-my answer is simply 2 Champions League titles, 1 World Club Championship, 1 Schudetto, 1 Coppa Italia, 2 European Supercups in the last 6 years. Compare Milan’s transfer spending and wage bill to that of other clubs with a similar number of equivalent trophies in the same period – Man Utd, Chelsea, Barcelona.
I’m not saying that Milan didn’t have transfer busts. Everyone has those. How do you judge a transfer policy? The return on the investments you make. Given the windfall Milan got from the trophies they won, and how much less they spent relative to similarly successful clubs, I can say they have a superior transfer policy.And if you want to go player by player:
Ronaldo – not a bust, provided the offense Milan needed in the Serie A to get into the Champions League. In 06/07, the focus was clearly the CL. Also proved to be a good mentor to Pato. I consider his tranfer fee (around 9M I think) to be the cost of Pato’s education.Gilardino – 36 goals in 94 games is not the sign of a bust, and he scored some important ones. He just didn’t fit into the squad that well. And he embarrased himself beyond repair with that dive against Celtic.
Dida – won us the CL in 2003 with those penalty saves. Not a bust. Not a great shelf life, but not a bust
Senderos, Cardacio, Viudez – are you serious? You can really only judge if a guy is a bust if he plays and sucks. Give them some time
Dinho – (Milans scoring chart this year: Pato -9, Kaka -9, Dinho -7…how about assists? Seedorf, Kaka, Pato – 4 each, Dinho – 3). Game winning goals? 3 at least. Based on results (and not on what perhaps he could be doing) how exactly is Dinho a bust?
@Sam
you started your argument with “last season in serieA…” conveniently omitting the season before that where he had 18 starts and 15 sub appearances. The fact that his play time was so drastically reduced should say something. And plus, if you watched the body of his performances (which I did), what tangible results did he have to show for that justified a place over Seedorf, or Kaka, who were his competition for a starting spot? In fact, how many of those games did you watch at all?Posted from
United States

-



Ok Shingai, I get your point in viewing at it from the Silverware cabinet. It is somehow logical. I`m not ungrateful, in fact I am very proud to be a Rossonero. But you extended the period for one year and got CL, Eu Super Cup and Coppa. It was the Scudetto, when there was a spin in transfer policy. Before that the policy had a vision, continuity. After that, there was no vision and it became a dubious policy. Too little is done in order to preserve a healthy core of the team and to maintain continuity. This house of cards can collapse every “minute”, it`s too vulnerable. We were very close to it few days ago. And if that happens, there will be 5 years with nothing to be proud of. And to tell you the truth, I would rather see a Scudetto in our hands than these “eu/world cups”. The home league is the mirror of our recent transfer policy.
As for the players, I liked Gila very much, but his goals didn`t contribute much to the CL title. The goals from Kaka and Superpippo were crucial. Then again, difference was around 10 ml (buy/sell).
Dida, credits for the penalties, although they are just a lottery. In his best times he had the best defence in the world and when the defence got old, he became an average. And when Milan should busted him, no, he enforced the astronomical pay rise and Fester approved it and was pointing out on that penalties. And now, he is enjoying life… I would too.
Regarding Dinho, I will be only pleased with his purchase if we win the Scudetto, otherwise, his goals will be useless. There are other players who know how to score and also know how to run and defend. No need for no look passes.
But in reality, Milan will have to work very hard to secure the CL spot! If not, the house will be at risk again.Posted from
Slovenia

-



Also, the policy has to be hand in hand with team needs and the Coaches wishes. I don`t see it these years. Carlo is just nodding… Whatever comes in our ranks.
Posted from
Slovenia

-



You make good points Milams
Posted from
United States

Read the rest of the comments
Comments are closed













